Wednesday, 21 September 2011

SENSE & SENSIBILITY BICENTENARY CELEBRATION - GUESPOST BY LYNN SHEPHERD AND GIVEAWAY


Tracing the roots of Sense & Sensibility

Samuel Richardson, Jane Austen, and Elinor & Marianne

By Lynn Shepherd


What do we know about the origins of Sense & Sensibility? We know that it was probably Jane Austen’s first attempt at a full-length novel, written when she may have been as young as 20. We know that she originally called it Elinor & Marianne. And we know that it began life in the form of a novel-in-letters. And it’s that which gives us the biggest clue about where she may have found her inspiration.

Jane Austen’s favourite author was Samuel Richardson, known now as the ‘father of the English novel’, and a literary giant of the 18th century. Austen’s nephew, James-Edward Austen-Leigh, tells us that his aunt knew Richardson’s works in minute detail, and her knowledge “was such as no one is likely again to acquire . . . Every circumstance narrated in Sir Charles Grandison, all that was said or done in the cedar parlour, was familiar to her; and the wedding days of [characters like] Lady L. and Lady G. were as well remembered as if they had been living friends.”

Very few people read Richardson these days, which is a shame, and even fewer read Sir Charles Grandison, which is the last, longest, and least interesting of his three novels. Clarissa, by contrast, is widely accepted to be masterpiece of European literature, and contains one of its most extraordinary and charismatic and anti-heroes – Robert Lovelace, the aristocratic rake who abducts and eventually rapes the heroine, Clarissa Harlowe. But what all Richardson’s novels have in common is the fact that they are written as a series of letters, and it’s obvious that this must have influenced Austen’s initial decision to write Elinor & Marianne in exactly that form.


The novel-in-letters

The story of Clarissa, for example, takes place through two parallel sets of letters – Clarissa’s with her friend Anna Howe, and Lovelace’s with his associate Belford. This technique has a number of important advantages for a novelist – it allows each character to speak in their own voice, and it allows the writer to explore their inner motivations with great subtlety. In the hands of a master like Richardson this approach established a whole new way of presenting character in prose fiction. We know Austen was influenced by this, because her brother Henry tells us so, saying that she greatly admired “Richardson’s power of creating, and preserving, the consistency of his characters.”  It’s easy to see how the novel that eventually became Sense & Sensibility would have been enriched by the example Richardson provided of profound psychological analysis and insight.

On the other hand, the letter form also imposes some quite severe logistical limitations on the way a story can be told. The most obvious example is that the characters have to be apart for large sections of the narrative. This works brilliantly well in Clarissa, where the heroine is first confined to her parents’ house, and later kept in effective imprisonment by Lovelace, and forced to smuggle out her letters to Anna. However, there are no such constraints on the characters in Austen’s story, and you can see how the plot of Sense & Sensibility as we now have it might have made the letter form rather unwieldy. She might, for example, have had to manufacture reasons to keep her sisters apart, because neither would have been likely to write the sort of intimate, revealing letters the story requires to anyone apart from each other.


The other crucial point here is that in Richardson’s and Austen’s day young unmarried people were not permitted to correspond with one another (though Marianne does, of course, break this taboo, leading Elinor to assume that she and Willoughby must be engaged). Again, in Clarissa, Richardson turns what seems like a drawback into an advantage as we read parallel letters in which the same events are presented from the two protagonists’ different perspectives. However, the story of Sense & Sensibility does not lend itself so naturally to this format, not least because there is no obvious confidant for Edward to write to, and he does not have the sort of open disposition that might have led him to write freely of the dilemma he finds himself in – engaged to one woman, but in love with another. This may be one of the reasons Austen eventually abandoned the letter form and recast the novel in the third-person narrative we have today.


Plot, character, and scene

Richardson’s work was also a great mine of inspiration for specific aspects of Austen’s evolving novel. We can see echoes, for example, of Clarissa’s death-bed scene in Marianne’s illness, and of Elinor’s last interview with Willoughby in a similar scene where Anna confronts Lovelace. Likewise Austen explores some of the themes already examined in Richardson’s novels – for example, Richardson’s contention that one his aims in writing Clarissa was to show young woman the fallacy of the notion that ‘a reformed Rake makes the best Husband’, or as Elinor puts it, that ‘worst and most irremediable of all evils - a connection for life with an unprincipled man’. You can also see Austen taking aspects of the characters in Richardson’s books, and re-working them for her own novel: Marianne, for example, has the vivacity and energy of Anna Howe, while Colonel Brandon recalls Mr Hickman, the solid, well-principled but rather dull man Anna eventually marries.


So there you are – if you’ve never read any Richardson I do recommend him, and if you’d like a quick and very enjoyable taster of his work before you embark on a mammoth novel like Clarissa, I recommend the BBC dramatization starring Sean Bean. It’s very faithful to the novel, and extremely well done. And if you’d like to read more detail about the many parallels between Sense & Sensibility and Richardson’s novels, there’s a very good book on this whole subject by Jocelyn Harris called Jane Austen’s Art of Memory.

  
Lynn Shepherd is the author of the award-winning Murder at Mansfield Park. Her next novel – another literary murder inspired by Charles Dickens’ Bleak House – will be published in the UK in February under the title Tom-All-Alone’s, and in the US next summer as The Solitary House.




GIVEAWAY TIME!!!

Leave your comments and e-mail address to enter the giveaway of  a new copy of The Annotated Sense and Sensibility. This contest is open worldwide and ends on 30th September . 

Good Luck!

Check all the posts in the Sense and Sensibility Bicentenary Celebration

PERSUADE ME BY JULIET ARCHER - GIVEAWAY WINNER


Juliet Archer was my guest last week for a lively "Talking Jane Austen with ..." session (HERE) . Many thanks to her for being with us and for granting you a copy of her latest publication, Persuade Me, a modern re-telling of Austen's last novel. 
Here's the name of the lucky winner in the draw I've just carried out with the help of random.org  : 

JENNIFER!!!

Congratulations to her! For all the others there will be soon a new chance to win this delightful Austenesque novel, since Juliet Archer will be my guest again with a piece about Wentworth's X - factor. Stay tuned!




Monday, 19 September 2011

HEATHER LYNN RIGAUD & FITZWILLIAM DARCY ROCK STAR - JANE AUSTEN ROCKS! AUTHOR INTERVIEW & GIVEAWAY


Welcome on My Jane Austen Book Club, Heather, and congratulations on publishing your new novel. I read and reviewed it  (HERE) , so I know what we are talking about. Fitzwilliam Darcy, Rock Star is actually well-written, though I must confess I was … surprised by my fast pace while reading. It was intriguing, sexy and romantic at the same time.

Now, first question! How did it come that you started writing a “ sex-drugs-and-rock’n’roll” austenesque novel?

Well, I was reading other Austen fan fiction and was encouraged by my friends to try writing a story. So I started with a few short stories, and then worked up to a novel.

When planning FDRS I was thinking about what kind of lifestyle could Darcy have that would be true to him and still give him the status and prestige appropriate to the story. So I thought about an artist or a musician. Of course, he'd have to be a successful, well known artist or musician. None of this slaving away in obscurity for him! So a very talented, world famous artisan it was.

And then I was simply inspired by some music. Like most people, I find that music helps me deal with trying situations, so I figured, why not Darcy? In Austen's work Darcy has to deal with some very tragic and difficult situations. As a young man his parents die, and he has the massive responsibility of an enormous estate with many employees depending on him, and more challengingly, he has to care for his younger sister.  That's what Austen wrote, that's canon.

 

Rock Guitarist by Yuriy Shevchuk



So I figured that Darcy might deal with these complicated feelings through music, especially if I gave him a musical family. From there, it was a short leap to Fitzwilliam Darcy Rock Star- he would be extremely talented, because anything Darcy does he does well. He would be aloof and proud, because of his talent and his wealth. And he would be very protective of his friends and family, because he believes he's smarter and better then them.

Into his life would come Elizabeth Bennet, who doesn't like to be told she's not good enough.  And the story starts there.

Was it difficult to find a publisher?

Not at all. When FDRS was first posted on a JAFF board, the readers made their own albums of the music, complete with fancy covers, and bought T-shirts for the (fictional) concert tour. When I presented my solid story with the fact that it had endeared such a following, I got an offer within a week.

 Were you inspired by any real rock band - boy band or girl band - to write your characters?

Puddle of Mudd
Sheryl Crow
Slurry sounds like Puddle of Mudd, more than anything else. There are a few other bands/songs but mostly it's Puddle of Mudd. Jane sounds like Michele Branch and Elizabeth sounds like Sheryl Crow. One of those "Once it's pointed out, it's obvious" things is that both of Lizzy's videos shoots are based directly on Sheryl Crow's SteveMcQueen and Soak Up the Sun.

Can you tell us what your characters share with Jane Austen heroes and heroines and in what they differ, instead?

Darcy share's his pride, aloofness and need to protect his friends. He's different because he's somewhat trapped in his golden cage. Elizabeth is still funny, charming and still is embarrassed by her family/lifestyle. She's worried about her career, which in the regency would be being a wife, but now is being a musician. Jane is still Jane-good and sweet and only sees the best in others. Charles is mostly Charles, although I gave him a bit of a spine. Charlotte is still the very, very pragmatic "You should show more affection than you feel" soul that she was in Austen. But she's modern and has modern social mores, and she's not going to settle for Collins and his chickens.

Caroline is a very different character, in that she's still in love with Darcy, but she's not a mean, nasty, suck-up. And hence is more competition for Darcy. (But not really. Don't worry.) And Richard. Poor, poor, poor Richard. He's a new man all together.  Really, only his name and his relation to Darcy stayed the same. Well, and that he's nice and charming.

Of  all the characters in Pride and Prejudice, which was the most difficult to adapt? The easiest one?

There are some that were so difficult I didn't even try, like Mary and Lydia. And I think Jane's pretty tough. It's hard to make someone that naïve and sweet work without making her look really stupid. She was hard. (And she was always speaking with an English accent in my head.) I think the easiest one was Lady Catherine, who becomes the gorgon who runs the Rosings Park record company. She makes an excellent tyrant CEO.

How would you define your novel? Fan fiction? Modernization ? Re-telling? What makes it different from the deluge of Pride and Prejudice- inspired books?

I don't feel the need to label it beyond Jane Austen Inspired Fiction. As for what makes it different, I think the Rock Star aspect pretty well covers it.

 Try to present it to our readers in max 50 words

It's a sexy modern version of Pride and Prejudice in which Darcy is a world famous guitarist and leader of the Rock Band Slurry. Elizabeth is the guitarist for the up & coming girl group, Long Borne Suffering. LBS is hired as the warm-up act on Slurry's tour and immediately the sparks begin flying.

Who do you think is your ideal target reader? 

Adult readers who enjoy contemporary romances. I hope that Austen fans will appreciate the references to Pride & Prejudice, but its not necessary to be familiar with the story to enjoy my book.

Sexy romance, steamy scenes, the glamour of the showbiz and truly contemporary Darcy, Elizabeth, Charlotte, Jane, Charles Bingley and Richard Fitzwilliam. Do you think true Janeites can enjoy reading your novel? Or do you fear their criticism most of all?

I think it's unfair to generalize a group as diverse as the Janeites in to one body. I think some of them will enjoy it and some will find it's not their cup of tea. I haven't written anything that would cause me to fear someone's reaction.

When was your first encounter with Jane Austen? Reading which of her novels?

My first encounter was Bridget Jones's Diary, which was a loose adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. From that, I was inspired to read Pride and Prejudice, and from there, the rest of Austen's works.

Renée Zelweger and Colin Firth in Bridget Jones's Diary

Did you decide to write such a contemporary version of her Pride and Prejudice because you felt it kind of … out –of –date?

Actually, I feel the exact opposite. It's because Austen's characters are so strong and vivid that it's easy to picture them in a modern setting. There was some updating to do on details of the plot, like Jane being too sick to travel 3 miles to her home, but the main themes of the plot are certainly timeless.

What is it that still attracts so many readers to Jane Austen’s novels in your opinion?

Jane Austen is still so popular because her characters are rich and very complete, and so seem contemporary to us, and because the major points of her plots are timeless. Also because its excellent, truly excellent writing. Austen is a genus when it comes to painting her characters and their emotions in just enough words to make the image perfectly clear. She also knew how to respect the reader's intelligence. Her pacing is excellent and the dramatic rise of the story to its climax is textbook.

What is your favourite one? And what about your favourite Austen hero/heroine?

My favorite novel has to be Pride and Prejudice, simply because of the skill and talent of her writing. And I think my favorite character is Darcy. He wins me over every time.

Matthew MacFadyen as Mr Darcy 


 Are you working on a new project? Could you tell us something about that?
             
I am working on another modern adaptation of Pride and Prejudice called Longborne and Pemberley go to War. I'm also working on an original paranormal romance and I'd like to do an updating of Northanger Abbey.


Thanks a lot, Heather. That’s all for now. Good luck and success to you and your Darcy  Rock Star!

Thank you for having me here today Maria, I'm looking forward to meeting your readers.

GIVEAWAY TIME!!!


Readers from the US or Canada will have the chance to win a free copy of Heather Lynn Rigaud's "Fitzwilliam Darcy Rock Star". Leave your comments/questions for Heather and don't forget to add your e-mail address. This giveaway ends on September 26th. Good luck!

Thursday, 15 September 2011

TALKING JANE AUSTEN WITH JULIET ARCHER + GIVEAWAY

Her PERSUADE ME, second book in the Darcy & Friends series, has just been released today, 15th September. Meet Juliet Archer, read our chat about Jane Austen and her work, leave your reply to our final question and win a copy of this brand new novel!

Hello Juliet and welcome back to my little corner of the blogosphere! 

It’s wonderful to be back at My Jane Austen Book Club! Thank you for inviting me, Maria, and ‘Hi’ to everyone out there. To introduce myself, I write updated versions of Jane Austen novels. So far, I’ve had two published: The Importance of Being Emma and Persuade Me. I describe myself as a 19th-century mind in a 21st-century body – actually, some days it’s the other way round!

Jane Austen and modernity. What would her wit’s favourite targets have been if she had written nowadays?

In some ways, I don’t think there’d be much change. Her novels are brilliant studies of how people interact with each other, especially how they fall in and out of love. But the social context is very different, and that’s where the change would be. For example, I can imagine her being intrigued by internet dating and social media! I also think the modern workplace would have provided plenty of material.

What would she have appreciated the most in our world, instead?

Plumbing, medicine and travel.

You know I’m a teacher to teenage students. Do you think she can still teach/be a model for nowadays youth?

Absolutely! I wrote The Importance of Being Emma with my then teenage daughter in mind. Once you remove the social context, you’re left with all the things that still influence relationships between men and women: the social/economic divide, first impressions, keeping/betraying secrets, jealousy, the attraction (and abuse) of power and status, etc.

Let’s play a bit. If you had the possibility to get lost in one of Jane Austen’s novels (like Amanda, the protagonist of LOST IN AUSTEN), which one would you choose? Why?

This is a really tricky one! I think perhaps the most fascinating would be the introspective, at times stifling world of Mansfield Park. I’d get to know Edmund and Henry better, then decide which of them deserves Fanny more – and meddle shamelessly to bring that about.

You wrote “The Importance of Being Emma”, your first successful Austen modernization. Many critics agree Emma is Jane Austen’s most successful literary achievement. Do you agree with them? Which is your favourite among the major six?

Another tricky one! Yes, I agree. I think Emma is Austen’s most flawed and least sympathetic heroine (although it’s a close call with Fanny on the second point!). So the fact that she gets her comeuppance when she thinks Mr Knightley is going to marry Jane, then Harriet, makes the novel more satisfying. The plot also has elements of other genres – farce and detective story – which disguise what’s really happening. Maybe that’s why I chose to write my modernisation in the first person, alternating between hero and heroine. They present the reader with such conflicting accounts of reality!
My favourite among the six? Whichever one I’m modernising! In each one, Austen’s genius works in different ways. But if I could take only one to a desert island it would be Pride & Prejudice.

The huge spreading  of spin-offs, sequels, mash-ups is due to a desire to preserve Jane’s messages, atmospheres, techniques and prolong the pleasure, or more to the ambition to correct and adapt. What in her work is considered too distant or different?

Apart from the whole social context, very little – because she wrote about things that never change, the interactions between men and women. However, I regularly take ‘liberties’ in three areas. First, few of her characters have both parents around, and even then they’re rarely role models! That’s still true today – but because of the increase in marriage break-ups and step-families, rather than early death. Second, most of her brothers and sisters live together; in the modern world, however, we have the means and expectation to live away from our families. To address both of these differences, I usually fabricate a parent or two – even if they’re largely off stage, like George Knightley in The Importance of Being Emma – and reduce the degree of ‘fraternisation’: for example, in Persuade Me, Anna lives apart from her father and sister, and Wentworth only stays for the odd weekend with his sister and her husband. Finally, there’s the sex. In Austen it’s lurking under the surface (you can tell I’m a fan of Andrew Davies’s adaptations!) but never expressed; in my books it finds some expression, although I hope it’s never out of keeping with the story.

Isn’t the romantic aspect of her novels over-emphasized in the film versions or TV series we’ve seen so far? (not that I mind romance, but those romantic scenes in the movies are so often  not at all Austen-style!)

Well, although I’m a big Andrew Davies fan, I have to be in the right frame of mind to watch his and other people’s adaptations, whereas I can always pick up one of Austen’s books – her writing style is understated and unsentimental, leaving so much to the imagination! Of course, the film/TV versions are portraying Austen through modern eyes, and often with commercial reality in mind. What they can’t really convey is the actual context of the books; they gloss over – often literally – the hardships of life in early 19th-century England, and the limited options open to most of Austen’s heroines. How many of Austen’s contemporaries would have turned down Darcy’s first proposal – especially if he was anything like Colin Firth or Matthew Macfadyen?!   

The protagonists of your modern re-telling of Persuasion are Anna Elliot and Rick Wentworth. Do you think Anne and Wentworth are Austen’s most successful match among the many she tells about?

Yes. They are the only couple who’ve fallen in love before the story starts. In Persuasion, Austen describes how they work through the pain of their past, and address the distractions of the present, to earn that love all over again. So their relationship, though broken, is on a more solid footing from the start – because in the intervening years they’ve never found anyone else who measured up.
However, as Darcy and Lizzy go through a huge journey of self-discovery during Pride & Prejudice, I have to say that I think their match is equally successful.

Thanks a lot, Juliet, for being my guest. Good luck in your writing career and fingers crossed for the launch of Persuade Me, just published today!

GIVEAWAY TIME!!!




And now a question for everyone: based on Anne and Wentworth’s broken engagement first time round in Persuasion, what do you think Jane Austen is saying about young love? If you want to be entered into the draw for a worldwide giveaway of Persuade Me, please include your email address when you reply in your comment! Giveaway ends  on Sept. 21st. 

THE UNEXPECTED MISS BENNET BY PATRICE SARATH - GIVEAWAY WINNER


It's  been nice to host Patrice Sarath and to talk Jane Austen with her (HERE) ! Thanks to her for finding the time to answer my questions and to all of you who left their comments and entered the giveway. Among them,  Brandy who won the free copy offered by the author!

Congratulations!!!

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

PERSUADE ME BY JULIET ARCHER - MY REVIEW


When do you let your heart rule your head?

Persuasion. When you like a story so much you never have enough of it.    I haven’t read much based on Persuasion actually, this is the first modern re-telling of my favourite Austen. It was a real page turner despite my already knowing what was next. It was intriguing to see how Juliet Archer made those familiar events take place in such a different context, for example. She often surprised me and her smooth,  involving narration kept me interested all the time.  
This  is the second book in the series “Darcy & Friends”,  which Juliet Archer started with her brilliant and successful  ,  “The Importance of Being Emma”.

“Persuade Me” is a nowadays re-telling of Anna (Anne) Elliot’s regrets and Rick (Frederick) Wentworth’s constant but resentful  love for her.  Anna (18) and Rick (22) meet in France during a summer holiday while she was baby-sitting and he teaching sailing before both go  on with their careers. She was going to move to Oxford to graduate and he was moving to Australia for his PhD. It’s love at first sight, an unforgettable experience, an overwhelming passion which has to face reality as soon as Anna’s father, Sir Elliot 8th Baronet of Kellynch,  and her godmother, Minty aka Lady Russell , find that out. Anna is persuaded not  follow Rick to Australia as he asked.  She must go to Oxford and get her degree, and especially , she can’t marry a nobody like him. Anna let them persuade her, that's her fault. She feels she can’t be so impulsive, she risks being caught in an unhappy choice like her mother.

Ten years after Anna is a University Professor in Russian Literature in Bath and Rick is a worldwide famous expert in Marine Biology who has just  published a book, soon become a best-selling : “Sex in the Sea” Rick’s gorgeous looks have turned him into an object of desire for many a woman,  but he has just broken up a long lasting relationship with a beautiful supermodel, Shelley McCourt. Well, she dumped him down for a millionaire, actually.  But now that  Rick is going back to England to launch his book there, lots of memories come back to his mind. He is still hurt for being left that way ten years earlier: he will never forget and never forgive. His pride is doubly hurt now that also Shelley  left him.

Memories intrude and both have to face each other's past and present feelings. Anna has to deal with another man from her past, while Rick is made the focus of unwanted attention by his celebrity status. Things will not be easy for them and what makes it even more complicated is that Anna's image-obsessed family is still ready to interfere ...

Persuade Me by Juliet Archer will be released
on 15th September by Choc Lit Limited 

N.B. Juliet Archer will be my guest for a friendly chat about Jane Austen and Persuade Me on 15th September. Stay tuned! You'll get your chance to win this beautiful modern romance inspired to Persuasion.


Thursday, 8 September 2011

TALKING JANE AUSTEN WITH ... PATRICE SARATH & GIVEAWAY

Patrice Sarath is the Austin-Texas based author of The Unexpected Miss Bennet, a sequel to Pride & Prejudice, and two fantasy novels, Gordath Wood and Red Gold Bridge. Patrice’s fascination with Jane Austen began in her early twenties, and she became a voracious reader of all of Austen’s books. She wrote The Unexpected Miss Bennet to answer the question, why didn’t Mary Bennet wed Mr. Collins? They would have been perfect together. The more she delved into Mary’s backstory, the more she realized that Mary Bennet deserved a much better hero, and thus Mr. Aikens galloped into the story.
 Read our Austen chat, leave your comment and e-mail address to enter a giveaway of a copy of The Unexpected Miss Bennet. Open worldwide, the contest ends on September 15th when the winner is announced. 

The huge spreading  of spin-offs, sequels, mash-ups is due to a desire to preserve and Jane’s messages, atmospheres, techniques and prolong the pleasure or more to the ambition to correct and adapt  what in her work is considered too distant or different?
Oh, surely the first. I think all these sequels are striving to capture her style and wit and extend her world so readers can enjoy it more. I don’t think anyone is trying to correct what she has done, although some adaptations and sequels take things to an extreme.

Do  you think that all these adaptations, both written and for the  screen, could alter, mislead  or even distort the interpretation of Austen’s work?
Oh yes. Especially some of the most recent adaptations. I know film is a different storytelling medium but some of the televised adaptations that recently aired seemed to miss the point. Several years ago, a New Yorker film critic quipped that the reason there were so many adaptations of Jane Austen was because her work lent itself so well to conversion to screen. As the article put it, all you had to do was type Fade In, run Austen’s dialog, and type Fade out at the end. If that was the case, then some screenwriters didn’t get the message and messed with perfection.

Isn’t the romantic  aspect of  her novels over- emphasized in the film versions or TV series we’ve seen so far? (not that I mind romance, but those romantic scenes in the movies are so often  not at all Austen-style!)
I agree. I really think the romance is only part of the package and the emphasis on the happily ever after is missing the point.


What would Jane Austen's wit’s  favourite targets have been if she had written nowadays?
Sort of like a reverse Lost in Austen? I think once she got over the disorientation, she would have kept to her subject – families, society, and how our neighbors provide so much amusement for us.
What would she have appreciated the most in our world, instead?
I think that Jane, who never married and who was keenly aware of the precarious position women had in society in the 1800s, would have appreciated the fact that women nowadays can be financially secure and had rights to their own property and the right to an education and to make a living, with or without being married. Behind the pretty dresses of the Regency era were some harsh truths for women and girls.


Why should we still read her novels according to you? What can we learn from them? (a question my students often ask me, why do we have to read the classics?)
Silly students! Part of Austen’s allure is that she is writing about a society that seems so different from ours but it is really so familiar. I bet if students set out identifying all the ways that they know people in their lives and could map them on to characters in Pride & Prejudice or Emma they would get a real appreciation for how Austen resonates today. For example, in Sense & Sensibility, when the older brother talks himself out of taking care of his stepmother and stepsisters and rationalizes the yearly allowance down to a pittance, it’s a really pointed example of that very common thought process.


Many critics agree Emma is Jane Austen’s most successful literary achievement. Do you agree with them? Which is your favourite among the major six?
I can see Emma being the most successful literary achievement. I just re-read it and found a new appreciation for Austen’s accomplishment. My personal favorite is Persuasion. I think that Austen has really come into her full powers as a novelist. And Persuasion itself occupies a place on the cusp of the new English novel  and poetry that was going to sweep the literary world in a decade or so – Romanticism. Austen’s description of the force of nature and the profound lure of the English countryside foreshadows this new movement (note Anne’s dislike of Bath and the accident at Lyme on the seawall). Persuasion makes me wish that Austen had lived longer. I think she would have done amazing work.

How would you advertise your book in less than 50 words?

Why didn’t Mary Bennet marry Mr. Collins? They would have been perfect for each other. But Mary soon learns that she has more to offer the world than marriage to a foolish man. Mary grows up, becomes acquainted with her own strengths, and makes her own surprising match.


Let’s play a bit. If you had the possibility to get lost in one of Jane Austen’s novels (like Amanda , the protagonist of LOST IN AUSTEN) , which one would you choose? Why?
It might be a bit cliché, but I think Pride & Prejudice, so I could meet Mary. I like her a lot – she actually says things that are quite smart, but no one ever listens to her. I’d like to be her friend and talk about books. I did read Fordyce’s Sermons when preparing for writing The Unexpected Miss Bennet, so we would have that in common.



Let’s go on playing. Thinking of the perfect match among Austen characters. Which is the happiest couple among the ones Jane formed? The least happy couple?
Jane Bennet and Charles Bingley were the happiest. Mr. Bennet said so, and I believe him. Setting aside Lydia and Wyckham, because I don’t think that one counts (too easy), I would say the least happy would be Catherine and Henry. Catherine is far too young, and I think Henry’s got a bit of his father in him. But I know there are plenty of readers who are Team Henry out there, so I’m sure I will hear about that!


Wednesday, 7 September 2011

GIVEAWAY WINNER - MERITS AND MERCENARIES BY LADY A.


Thanking Lady A. for the interesting answers she granted my humble questions for last week's "Talking Jane Austen with ..." session,  I open this brief posting of mine. The winner's name has been picked up for Lady A.'s "Merits and Mercenaries" and I'm here to announce it.

Gayle Mills

Congratulations!!! 

Saturday, 3 September 2011

JENNIFER ZIEGLER & SASS AND SERENDIPITY ON FLY HIGH (MY OTHER BLOG)



If you liked my "Talking Jane Austen with ..." Jennifer Ziegler and tried to win her latest novel, Sass and Serendipity, here's another chanche for you. Jennifer is my guest on FLY HIGH!  with a brilliant post about romancing love, teenage memories and her new book. I just love it. CLICK HERE, read it and get a new chance to win the  giveaway contest open worldwide.

TO ENTER THE NEW GIVEAWAY , 
LEAVE YOUR COMMENT ON FLY HIGH!

Thursday, 1 September 2011

TALKING JANE AUSTEN WITH … Lady A~, Authoress of Merits and Mercenaries, the First Novel of The Bath Novels of Lady A~ (TBNLA) 7-Book Collection. Interview and giveaway.

'A lady' is, in fact, 'Lady A~'. Both are nom de plumes that were conversely and cleverly employed by Jane Austen to disguise her identity. This modern-day 'Lady A~/A Lady' not only pays homage to her literary muse in the wry anonymity of her pen name, but does so also in the purist 'Austenesque' style and genre of her work. Over a period of fifteen years she has convincingly created a unique companion collection, to JA's perfect six, of seven original novels entitled (collectively) The Bath Novels of Lady A~.  'A Lady/Lady A~' has been a scholar of Jane Austen's works for over three decades and, since publishing Merits and Mercenaries, the first of the Bath Novel 'Classic Companions', has established a dedicated, and steadily growing, 'Janeite' fan base across the globe, spanning America to The Netherlands.

        Many critics agree Emma is Jane Austen’s most successful literary achievement. Do you agree with them? Which is your favourite among the major six? No. Mansfield Park is without question Jane’s finest novel. Though it is considered as the most prolix of the six, and its heroine, Fanny Price, has been described as a ‘prig Pharisee’, it is by far the most definitive opus of Austen’s oeuvre. The counter play of true villainy (the Norris hex, the Crawford duo, the Bertram hypocrisy, the Establishment ‘tyranny’, &c.) versus lowly, creep-mouse Fanny Price is the most intriguing and complex human story spun out through Austen’s subtle but all-felling pen. Fanny is a supremely intricate heroine and, although (like her creator) she is not easy to ‘catch in the act of greatness’, it is the very lack of the ‘light, bright & sparkling’ that establishes her most significant presence on Austen’s Stage. Through her, the masterful plot exposes all that is meritorious and mercenary in its host of world-worthy characters and superlative set pieces. Fanny makes everything ‘black’ or ‘white’, cutting through ‘appearance’ straight to ‘reality’ and without any of the ‘fan’-fare. She is the heroine that I think Austen really identified with—a character mediating between a world of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’, while relying solely on the ‘better guide’ within herself against every opposing challenge. The brilliance of such satire is unparalleled. M.P. was the novel that first brought me to Austen (at age 15—I had an epiphany!) and remains my all-time JA favourite. It was also the chief inspiration for my first novel (and its title), ‘Merits and Mercenaries’.

         Do  you think that all these adaptations, both written and for the  screen, could alter, mislead  or even distort the interpretation of Austen’s work? At the risk of sounding ‘priggish’, and much like Fanny perhaps, I do think the quintessence of what is really ‘Austen’ has been lost from every adaptation of her work—although the ’95 BBC P&P adaptation may be the one ‘delicious’ exception. What we are reading and watching is ‘Austenesque’, not Austen. The subtlety of what Austen created is too ‘fine’ an art to be reproduced. That said, the overlying ‘icing’ on all of her six luscious cakes has been very ably exploited and we have all fallen very neatly into her clever, underlying  trap. The ‘ vehicles’ of ‘romance’ that drive the serious sub-text throughout her work are the very things that take us to the fundamental  moral meaning in the end, and no matter how well (or badly) her books are adapted.

       Jane Austen and modernity. What would her wit’s  favourite targets have been if she had written nowadays? I am convinced Austen had strong, independent political and philosophical sentiments that directly challenged those of her peers, family, &c.; after all she read the polemical likes of Bage and seemed (in her work) supportive of Wollstonecraft’s feminist views. Perhaps this is the reason why her relatives tried to paint a posthumous ‘portrait’ of her (albeit a mere silhouette) to the world of the exact opposite. If she lived today she probably would have been a celebrated, though anonymous, activist/satirist-extraordinaire who would have relished slicing into bankers, bigots and politicians alike.

        What would she have appreciated the most in our world, instead? The advancements of civil liberty and science. I hazard a guess she would have been quite thrilled over the notion of ‘emancipation’ and particularly fascinated, I think, with our cosmological discoveries. Her mention of ‘star-gazing’ in M.P. was not done on a whim. I conjecture that she often looked ‘up’ and questioned the origins of the boundless Universe, while contemplating her own existence in a very stifling, patriarchal realm.

      The Austen community online is crowded and widespread. What do you think of this odd match a Regency writer and the worldwide Net? ‘Odd’ aptly describes it. Austen was such a private person, even choosing anonymity in her authorship as ‘A Lady’, which the beau monde (suavely) changed to ‘Lady A—’. I am sure she would have been ‘grossly’ alarmed by the nature of what she unwittingly nurtured and would have clung obdurately to pen and paper, while keeping to her ‘Cottage’, if she could witness it. Although I am as much a part of the ‘alarm’, I often bewail  the interactive ‘bustle’ we have all created ‘around’ her, as we all clamour to climb on Jane’s ‘phaeton and four’.
          
      What is the peculiarity which makes Jane Austen’s genius unique? The wielding of simple words that swiftly transform into ‘swords’. She can strip the hide off a sycophantic parson or a pompous aristocrat without flinching—as they ‘bleed out’ before her—and in the most genteel fashion. Austen did not suffer fools gladly and I think she was something of a misanthropist. Her subtle delivery of this ‘disdain’ is, arguably, the very ‘brilliance’ of her genius.

       Why should we still read her novels according to you? What can we learn from them? (a question my students often ask me, why do we have to read the classics?) A complete no-brainer. Austen exposes the universal and fundamental failings and triumphs of the human condition, and without the lecture. She delivers the didactic message—but without ever ‘preaching’ it—and with consummate comedy. Her characters are exactly like people we all know, as are their trials and tribulations—that is what makes them interminably interesting. Her books are and will always be ‘companions’; friends that span time, class, creed and culture to take anyone and everyone to the same destination—humanity. This is why we must continue to read the classics, but most especially Austen.

       Was Jane Austen more a romantic girl or a matter-of- fact woman? A measure of both, I think. Undoubtedly there were dreams of love, consummation and emotional fulfilment, but I dare say, she looked at the rigours of marriage and what ‘a match’ meant, less ideally, for a woman. I can assure you she sized up the countless sufferings and casualties of childbirth against the rewards of love and congratulated herself, rather heartily, that she had avoided the (then) inevitable pitfalls of Regency ‘romance’.
       
      How would you advertise your book in less than 50 words?

      Witty modern classic with pure Austen sensibility—and (to quote a reviewer) ‘with a dash of [Wilkie] Collins’!


      Let’s play a bit. If you had the possibility to get lost in one of Jane Austen’s novels (like Amanda , the protagonist of LOST IN AUSTEN) , which one would you choose? Why?

      Fanny Price, because like Jane, she goes her own wilful little way. I am extremely wilful!

        Let’s go on playing. Thinking of the perfect match among Austen characters. Which is the happiest couple among the ones Jane formed? The least happy couple?

      Happiest/ Anne & Wentworth. Least Happy/ ‘Hap-less!’ Mrs Norris and Maria Bertram!
       
      As a teacher of English literature to teenagers I always like asking about teaching Jane Austen or introducing her to a young contemporary audience. Any tips?

     6 provocative novels comprising ‘Sex, Lies, Intrigue and Money’?

      
     Which Austen Novel would you like to write a sequel for ? Why? None. Simply because the essence of what I love about Austen would be lost in my translation. Just suppose Austen had gone the way of prequels and sequels in her admiration of Edgeworth and Burney, writers whom she admired and read with gusto? We would now, for instance, be reading hybrids of Evelina, rather than lapping up the singularly brilliant Emma. Austen was clever enough to take that which made both Burney and Edgeworth celebrated and turn it into her own, independent celebrity. With such fine example and with enough of Jane’s literary DNA to set the scene, in my case, there was more reason to write seven Austenesque originals, rather than attempt six Austen sequels. After all, for my part, I think there is a much greater challenge in creating new literary families ‘relative’ to their Austen ‘cousins’ rather than recycling the latter; in a manner of speaking, it more candidly takes up the torch that Jane passed on in good faith.

GIVEAWAY TIME !!! 




Lady A. has graciously granted one lucky commenter a signed copy of "Merits and Mercenaries".
You should please leave  your comment here, and add your e-mail address as well , in order to enter the giveaway. The contest is open worldwide and ends on September 7th when the name of the winner is announced.
Good luck every one!


Any good question for Lady A.?