Tracing the roots of Sense &
Sensibility
Samuel Richardson, Jane Austen, and Elinor & Marianne
By Lynn Shepherd
What do
we know about the origins of Sense &
Sensibility? We know that it was probably Jane Austen’s first attempt at a
full-length novel, written when she may have been as young as 20. We know that
she originally called it Elinor &
Marianne. And we know that it began life in the form of a novel-in-letters.
And it’s that which gives us the biggest clue about where she may have found
her inspiration.
Jane
Austen’s favourite author was Samuel Richardson, known now as the ‘father of
the English novel’, and a literary giant of the 18th century.
Austen’s nephew, James-Edward Austen-Leigh, tells us that his aunt knew
Richardson’s works in minute detail, and her knowledge “was such as no one is
likely again to acquire . . . Every circumstance narrated in Sir Charles
Grandison, all that was said or done in the cedar parlour, was familiar to
her; and the wedding days of [characters like] Lady L. and Lady G. were as well
remembered as if they had been living friends.”
Very few
people read Richardson these days, which is a shame, and even fewer read Sir Charles Grandison, which is the
last, longest, and least interesting of his three novels. Clarissa, by contrast, is widely accepted to be masterpiece of
European literature, and contains one of its most extraordinary and charismatic
and anti-heroes – Robert Lovelace, the aristocratic rake who abducts and
eventually rapes the heroine, Clarissa Harlowe. But what all Richardson’s
novels have in common is the fact that they are written as a series of letters,
and it’s obvious that this must have influenced Austen’s initial decision to
write Elinor & Marianne in
exactly that form.
The novel-in-letters
The story
of Clarissa, for example, takes place
through two parallel sets of letters – Clarissa’s with her friend Anna Howe,
and Lovelace’s with his associate Belford. This technique has a number of
important advantages for a novelist – it allows each character to speak in
their own voice, and it allows the writer to explore their inner motivations
with great subtlety. In the hands of a master like Richardson this approach established
a whole new way of presenting character in prose fiction. We know Austen was
influenced by this, because her brother Henry tells us so, saying that she
greatly admired “Richardson’s power of creating, and preserving, the
consistency of his characters.” It’s
easy to see how the novel that eventually became Sense & Sensibility would have been enriched by the example
Richardson provided of profound psychological analysis and insight.
On the
other hand, the letter form also imposes some quite severe logistical
limitations on the way a story can be told. The most obvious example is that
the characters have to be apart for large sections of the narrative. This works
brilliantly well in Clarissa, where
the heroine is first confined to her parents’ house, and later kept in
effective imprisonment by Lovelace, and forced to smuggle out her letters to
Anna. However, there are no such constraints on the characters in Austen’s
story, and you can see how the plot of Sense
& Sensibility as we now have it might have made the letter form rather
unwieldy. She might, for example, have had to manufacture reasons to keep her
sisters apart, because neither would have been likely to write the sort of
intimate, revealing letters the story requires to anyone apart from each other.
The other
crucial point here is that in Richardson’s and Austen’s day young unmarried
people were not permitted to correspond with one another (though Marianne does,
of course, break this taboo, leading Elinor to assume that she and Willoughby
must be engaged). Again, in Clarissa,
Richardson turns what seems like a drawback into an advantage as we read
parallel letters in which the same events are presented from the two
protagonists’ different perspectives. However, the story of Sense & Sensibility does not lend
itself so naturally to this format, not
least because there is no obvious confidant for Edward to write to, and he does
not have the sort of open disposition that might have led him to write freely
of the dilemma he finds himself in – engaged to one woman, but in love with
another. This may be one of the reasons Austen eventually abandoned the letter
form and recast the novel in the third-person narrative we have today.
Plot, character, and scene
Richardson’s
work was also a great mine of inspiration for specific aspects of Austen’s
evolving novel. We can see echoes, for example, of Clarissa’s death-bed scene
in Marianne’s illness, and of Elinor’s last interview with Willoughby in a
similar scene where Anna confronts Lovelace. Likewise Austen explores some of
the themes already examined in Richardson’s novels – for example, Richardson’s
contention that one his aims in writing Clarissa
was to show young woman the fallacy of the notion that ‘a reformed Rake makes
the best Husband’, or as Elinor puts it, that ‘worst and most irremediable of
all evils - a connection for life with an unprincipled man’. You can also see
Austen taking aspects of the characters in Richardson’s books, and re-working
them for her own novel: Marianne, for example, has the vivacity and energy of
Anna Howe, while Colonel Brandon recalls Mr Hickman, the solid, well-principled
but rather dull man Anna eventually marries.
So there
you are – if you’ve never read any Richardson I do recommend him, and if you’d
like a quick and very enjoyable taster of his work before you embark on a
mammoth novel like Clarissa, I recommend
the BBC dramatization starring Sean Bean. It’s very faithful to the novel, and
extremely well done. And if you’d like to read more detail about the many
parallels between Sense & Sensibility
and Richardson’s novels, there’s a very good book on this whole subject by
Jocelyn Harris called Jane Austen’s Art of Memory.
Lynn Shepherd is
the author of the award-winning Murder at
Mansfield Park. Her next novel – another literary murder inspired by
Charles Dickens’ Bleak House – will
be published in the UK in February under the title Tom-All-Alone’s, and in the US next summer as The Solitary House.
Leave your comments and e-mail address to enter the giveaway of a new copy of The Annotated Sense and Sensibility. This contest is open worldwide and ends on 30th September .
Good Luck!
Check all the posts in the Sense and Sensibility Bicentenary Celebration!
18 comments:
I was unaware that another author so influenced JA's writing. I appreciate your blog on it. Thank goodness, she developed her own style even with these influences. S&S as letters? I will have to read some of Samuel Richardson's work including 'Clarissa' which I have heard of before.
Thank you for the opportunity to enter a giveaway.
Sundee
sundee94@comcast.net
Yay, Lynn! :oD
Wow, so much information about Jane...this is what I love: there's always something new to learn, no matter how much you think you may know. Awesomesauce, to say the least! Also interesting to think about how S&S (or any Austen novel for that matter) would have turned out if Jane had taken a different approach to the writing...Hmm...
quarterback.girl[at]gmail[dot]com
Clarissa is in my wishlist. How I wish I had time for all the well worth reading book!!! But I will surely find time to read your book, Lynn, so enter me in the giveaway.
maribea@tiscali.it
Lovely post!
I would love to win that copy of the annotated Sense & Sensibility!!
My e-mail address
anitapado@gmail.com
Thank you!!
Hello! I love so much knowing more anything about my dear Jane. I love this space because you always give all of us an opportunity of knowledge.It's so more dificult to us here having diferent books about Jane and you're so generous sharing this with worldwide. Thans so very much, dear!God bless and have a wonderful time! :D Rachel Berault
Follower's name: Rachel Berault
Email: rachelwishmade@gmail.com
I've posted this on my sidebar
Very informative information in this post. I am anxious to read your annotated book. Thank you for the giveaway!
Marilyn
daniel423@centurytel.net
great! haven't read sense and sensibility yet :D
thank you for the giveaway!
I'm going to watch Clarissa..
I am reading the annotated S & S right now (it's wonderful!), so please do not enter me in the giveaway, but I wanted to say how much I enjoyed Lynn's post. The epistolary novel is a fascinating format, and I always enjoy reflecting on Austen's influences. Sir Charles Grandison is one of those novels that has been on my to read list for way too long. Question for Lynn - do you subscribe to the theory that P & P also began in epistolary form? I know it's a bit off topic, but I would love to know your take on this debate.
What an insightful and interesting post by Lynn Shepherd. Thank you for enlightening me on the origins of S&S.
evangelineace2020(at)yahoo(dot)com
Thank you everyone for such appreciative comments! I love Richardson's work, and feel it's such a shame that he's not read any more. As for Alexa's question, I think it very likely that the original P&P could have been in epistolary form - in fact it's much more like the Clarissa structure than S&S, when you think about it, with Elizabeth and Jane one pair of potential correspondents, and Darcy and Bingley the other. Austen could also have given us their separate 'takes' on the same events, such as the Netherfield Ball.
Good luck with Grandison too - it takes a while to get going, and there isn't much of a plot when all's said and done, but it really is like 'total immersion' into the 18th century!
I haven't read anything by S. Richardson, his novels didn't attract me so much. Besides this, a friend told me that Pamela was so boring... but I think I'll change my mind, probably I judged too superficially. Meanwhile, I'm going to watch the BBC adaptation you recommend. Thank you very much for this insight!
claudiagaggioli@virgilio.it
Very informative and good post. Thank you, Lynn.You are an inspiration to all Janeites. I haven't read any of the Richardson's work but after finishing Homer's Odyssey, I'll definitely go for 'Clarissa'. The more I learn about Jane, the more I am convinced that "I am proud to be a Janeite'.
What's distinctive about letters as a story-telling device is the directness. Events are always being told by someone with a stake in them to someone who's interested - in both senses of the word, and the 'real' reader sits in that privileged, but slightly prurient, place of correspondent. There's always plenty of 'voice' in a (good) epistolary novel. I've just written and directed a theatre piece for the bicentenary which draws a lot from Jane's early epistolary pieces - and the dramatisation really just happens; as she doubtless found when dramatising Sir Charles Grandison herself. For me, the presence of her voice which is such a delicious and distinctive part of her major novels, is a brilliant development from the epistolary.
That's a great point Kate - the 'triangular' relationship between the two correspondents inside the epistolary novel and the reader outside it is a fascinating area (and one I've written about in relation to Richardson). Likewise Richardson was indeed celebrated for his ability to catch the 'ebbs and flows' of the mind (especially the female mind!) and his books are often seen as an early precursor of the 20th century 'stream of consciousness' novels.
Wow! I've just finished to reread S&S in honour of the bicentenary, so I'd be very happy to win the annotated edition.
patti-wolit at tiscali.it
I really enjoyed this post, thank you. I just finished reading Clarissa last nignt (and am looking up what other people have to say on blogs, hence I found you) and I love what you've written.
I've got a problem with Sense and Sensibility - I cannot get into it at all. I've signed up to do a group read of it next month, so I will read it, but your post has given me new incentive, thank you!
Really Such a nice article...
Keep writing and keep motivating us...
Thank You so much...
Best Happy Birthday Status
Best Attitude Status
Happy Birthday Wishes in Hindi
Happy Birthday Wishes for Best Friend
Happy Birthday Wishes to Sister
Post a Comment