The book
(description of the book from Amazon.com) In contemporary pop culture, the pursuits regarded as the most
frivolous are typically understood to be more feminine in nature than
masculine. This collection illustrates how ideas of the popular and the
feminine were assumed to be equally naturally intertwined in the eighteenth
century, and the ways in which that association facilitates the ongoing trivialization
of both.
Top scholars in eighteenth-century studies examine the significance of
the parallel devaluations of women's culture and popular culture by looking at
theatres and actresses; novels, magazines, and cookbooks; and
populist politics, dress, and portraiture. They also assess how eighteenth-century women have been re-imagined in contemporary historical fiction, films, and television, from the works of award-winner Beryl Bainbridge to Darcymania and Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. By reconsidering the cultural and social practices of eighteenth-century women, this fascinating volume reclaims the ostensibly trivial as a substantive cultural contribution
populist politics, dress, and portraiture. They also assess how eighteenth-century women have been re-imagined in contemporary historical fiction, films, and television, from the works of award-winner Beryl Bainbridge to Darcymania and Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. By reconsidering the cultural and social practices of eighteenth-century women, this fascinating volume reclaims the ostensibly trivial as a substantive cultural contribution
My review
Released in July 2012, this is certainly not a quick, fun summer
read for any Austen fan in search of escapism in a relaxing romance, but a thorough university tome which any true
Janeite would love to own, proudly showcase
on their Austen-studies shelf, and would bless
each time they will be searching for information and details about the
world their favourite author lived in. Many essays are not directly
Austen-related and some of them refer to the society of the first half of the eighteenth century.
Anyway, all of them are really
interesting and highly accurate in describing a cultural and social reality
which must have greatly influenced Jane Austen and her contemporaries.
In the first part “Women, Popular
Culture and The Eighteenth Century”, scholars like Berta Joncus, Paula
Backscheider, Jessica Munns, Elaine Chalus
analyse on one hand the impact which popular culture had on the women of
the age and how they were depicted in forms of art and entertainment like the
theatre, the ballad opera or fashion. On
the other hand, the reader will discover the influence women had on the popular
culture of the age, being those genres and forms mainly addressed to them. In
Chalus’s essay, the conjuction between women, fashion and politics is analyzed
with references to Swift and Addison who,
as men and conservatives, saw women’s
use of fashion for political ends as a trivialization of one of their main
interests and as an invasion of an exclusive field where they used to champion their power.
In the second part, “Women, Reading and Writing”, among various all worth-reading works, a special notice goes to Isobel Grundy’s
“Women and Letters”. We know Jane Austen loved writing letters and we are
grateful for the many we were left to discover more about herself as well as
disappointed for the many we know were burnt by her sister Cassandra. In this
essay, Grundy proposes a social/cultural study of the profusion of letters
which became a new aspect of popular life in the 18th century in England
and which provide an uniqualled window for observing the shifting cultures of
dress, entertainments, social practices, politics and every other aspect of
changing human lives (p. 153).
In “Women Reading and
Writing for The Rambler”, Peter Sabor analyses the apparent failure in
popularity, especially among women, of Dr Johnson’s cultured journal The
Rambler. Addison could boast sales of 3,000 copies after two weeks from his publication of The Spectator, Johnson printed no more than 500 copies of each number of his own journal. What was
the reason of such a failure in the market of reading? Johnson’s indifference
to the “meteors of fashion” and insistence on writing for those with “leisure
for abstracted truth, and whose virtue could please by its naked dignity”
(p.202) There’s a reference to Jane Austen in this essay and to her reading and
liking The Rambler n.97 featuring
Richardson’s Sir Charles Grandison (p. 195)
One of the essays in part two is definitely Austen-related: Timothy
Erwin contributes an interesting reading of Northanger Abbey in “Comic Prints,
The Picturesque and Fashion: Seeing and Being Seen in Jane Austen’s Northanger
Abbey” (pp. 222-242)
More Austen-related chapters
are in the third and last part of the book, “Eighteenth century
women in modern popular culture:”
1. “Would you
have us laughed out of Bath?”Shopping around for Fashion and Fashionable
Fiction in Jane Austen adaptations" by Tamara S. Wagner
“Throughout Austen’s novels, shopping
doubles as a defining marker of satirized society and as a metonymy for
changing fashions in fiction. How to transpose such a metonymy onto screen
without reproducing an uncritical appreciation of commodification has long plague
literature adaptations. “ (p. 277)
2. "Visualizing
Empire in Domestic Settings: Designing Persuasion for the screen" by Andrew
MacDonald and Gina MacDonald
“Film makers must create visual images:
landscapes, buildings, animals, servants, costumes, decorations, lighting, and
general milieu that they imagine correspond to Austen’s turn-of-the-century
realities. Thus, it is not Austen’s genius creating what viewers see on screen,
but rather the skill and imagination of those responsible for inventing what
Austen does not spell out: a costume department doing research and producing
drawings, a design team making storyboards defining look and style …” (pp.
274-275)
3. "From Pride
and Prejudice to Lost in Austen and Back Again: Reading Television Reading
Novels" by Claire Grogan
“Jane Austen’s status as a cultural icon is
indisputabile. What is less clear is whether Austen’s works should be positioned
as part of an elite culture or as part
of popular culture since both she and her works travel what Stuart Hall terms a
cultural
escalator” (p. 312)
I’m really
glad I was granted an e-galley of this book from netgalley.com so that I’ve had
had to opportunity to leaf through such interesting articles and take some notes
from most of them. I definitely recommend
this book to any Janeite or 18th century lover and scholar.
1 comment:
sounds fascinating
Post a Comment